Reprinted by Blavatsky Study Center
Return to Contents page of "Theosophy versus Neo-Theosophy"
The Secret Doctrine
Theosophy: "The Secret Doctrine will explain many things, set to right
more than one perplexed student." (Mahatma Letters, p. 357, #63) "I have also noted your thoughts about the Secret
Doctrine. Be assured that what she has not annotated from scientific and other works, we
have given or suggested to her. Every mistake or erroneous notion, corrected and explained
by her from the works of other theosophists was corrected by me, or under my instruction.
It is a more valuable work than its predecessor, an epitome of occult truths that will
make it a source of information and instruction for the earnest student for long years to
come." (Letters From the Masters of the Wisdom, First Series, #19) "The same will be said of the Secret Archaic Doctrine,
when proofs are given of its undeniable existence and records. But it will take centuries
before much more is given from it... since the SECRET DOCIRINE is not a treatise, or a
series of vague theories, but contains all that can be given out to the world in this
century." (Secret Doctrine, I xxxviii) "...the 'Brothers...' never promised to guide, or even
protect, either the Body [of the Theosophical Society] or its members." (Blavatsky
Collected Writings III, p. 274) |
Neo-Theosophy: "Dr Weller Van Hook has a very useful article
in our present number, to which I draw the attention of our readers. As I have said in the
Bulletin for February, 'It is marked by the strong common sense, freedom of thought,
tolerance and open-eyed loyalty, which are so characteristic of the writer.' [italics
added] (Annie Besant, The Theosophist, March, 1922, p. 530) [A.B. was referring to
an article which contained the following quote.] "They, as they step aside, as did Madame Blavatsky,
leave their authority to appointed leaders who carry on the work under the original Power
that caused the organization to come into existence. To realize this is to find a new
respect for the Heads of the movement, and a new tolerance of their doings. It is to
recoqnise that there is no need to sustain a movement back to the teachinas of H.P.B. Our
present leaders suffice for the hour." [italics added] (Weller Van Hook, The
Theosophist, March, 1922) "We have no quarrel with the 'Back to Blavatsky'
movement. Ill would we have profited by her teachings, were we only to have marked time in
knowledge since she lef t us on the physical plane thirty years ago. I may, however, say
that whenever my Brother Leadbeater, or myself have come across anything which seemed to
conflict with anything she had written, we examined our observation with minute care, and
tested our own 'discoveries' by her statements." (Annie Besant, The Theosophist,
March, 1922, p. 595) [30] |